Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 5, e60-e62, December 2015

Reliability of RT-qPCR from degraded RNA samples: An in vitro model

Published:September 10, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.024

      Abstract

      A rapid and reliable protocol was developed to produce chemical degradation of the RNA in vitro. Cell line MDA-MB-453 was used as source of RNA and hydrolysis in water at 70 °C was performed. The outcome was monitored by RT-qPCR of two housekeeping targets and a significant correlation between the Ct and the extent of molecular damage of the template was found. A molecular degradation index of the RNA is proposed.

      Keywords

      1. Introduction

      RNA is an instable molecule and suboptimal storage conditions promote its degradation [
      • Lindahl T.
      Heat inactivation of transfer ribonucleic acids.
      ,
      • Fordyce S.
      • et al.
      Long-term RNA persistence in postmortem contexts.
      ]. Therefore, accurate assessment of its integrity is required for accurate gene expression studies [
      • Bustin S.A.
      • et al.
      The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real time PCR experiments.
      ]. The analysis of mRNA for the identification of the source of body fluids is a challenging task in Forensic Genetics. To this aim, after RNA extraction from the stain, the cDNA obtained from the reverse transcription (RT) is analyzed by either end point PCR or quantitative PCR (qPCR) [
      • Luusola J.
      • Ballantine J.
      Messenger RNA profiling: a prototype method to supplant conventional methods for body fluid identification.
      ,
      • Haas C.
      • et al.
      mRNA profiling for body fluid identification by reverse transcription end point PCR and realtime PCR.
      ,
      • Lindenbergh A.
      • et al.
      A multiplex (m)RNA-profiling system for the forensic identification of body fluids and contact traces.
      ]. Surprisingly, reliable RNA profiles were achieved from years-old stains by the employment of these approaches while even transcriptomic analysis was successfully performed from swabs stored sex weeks at room temperature [
      • Lin M.-H.
      • et al.
      Transcriptomic analysis of degraded forensic body fluids.
      ]. No data exists, however, on the level of RNA degradation that still allows a reliable RNA typing.
      Virtually infinite are the environmental conditions that promote RNA degradation [
      • Fordyce S.
      • et al.
      Long-term RNA persistence in postmortem contexts.
      ]. In addition, the employment of sets of naturally degraded RNA samples is quite expensive and time consuming. Therefore, a method to produce partially degraded samples was developed in vitro. The outcome of such procedure was then monitored by RT-qPCR analysis of two housekeeping targets.

      2. Materials and methods

      RNA was extracted from about 2 × 107 cells of the cell line MDA-MB-453 by Trizol method following standard procedures. After DNaseI treatment and ethanol precipitation, the sample was resuspended in water, quantified by Nanodrop (70 ng/μL) and stored at –70 °C until use. Five micrograms aliquots each were then hydrolyzed in duplicate at 70 °C for 0–11.5 h. After purification through Micron 3K columns, to visualize the outcome of the treatment 300 ng of each sample were run through agarose 1.2% gel for 20 min at 90 V. RT was carried out on 420 ng of each sample in a final volume of 20 μL at standard condition using Random Examers (IDT®). cDNA synthesis were then assessed (in triplicate) by two duplex-qPCR formats using the Jump Start 2x Ready Mix Taq (Sigma–Aldrich®). The short amplicon format (SAF) allows the simultaneous amplification of 60 bp fragments of GAPDH and PBGD targets while the long amplicon format (LAF) allows the amplification of 260 fragments of the same targets. TaqMan chemistry was employed for the detection of the syntheses (the probe of the GAPDH was labeled with 6FAM while that of the PDGD was labeled with VIC). PCR primers and TaqMan probes were designed by using the data of http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and the Primer Express software (Version 2.0 Applied Biosystems). Calibration data were obtained from scalar amounts (420–1.6 ng) of untreated control RNA. All the tests were performed by using a CFX96 Real-Time System (Biorad) thermocycler.
      The relative quantification (RQ) of the two targets in the treated samples was calculate by the formula RQ = E(Ct,ctrl–Ct,sample) [
      • Fleige S.
      • et al.
      Comparison of relative quantification models and impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
      ], where E is the experimental efficiency of the qPCRs. Least, to calculate the degradation index (D.I.) of the samples, the following formula was used: D.I. = log [QRGAPDH(60bp)/QRGAPDH(260bp)].

      3. Results and discussion

      RT-qPCR calibration data showed a LOQ of 420–1.6 ng for the SAF (r2 = 0.998 for GAPDH and r2 = 0.999 for PDGD) and a LOQ of 420–6.4 ng for the LAF (r2 = 0.986 for GAPDH and r2 = 0.943 for PDGD). Below 6.4 ng of template, no Ct could be observed for the PDGD of 260 bp, in agreement both with the molecular weight of this housekeeping target [
      • Fleige S.
      • et al.
      Comparison of relative quantification models and impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
      ,
      • Fleige S.
      • Plaff M.W.
      RNA integrity and the effect on real-time qRT-PCR performance.
      ,
      • Vermuelen J.
      • et al.
      Measurable impact of RNA quality on gene expression results from quantitative PCR.
      ] and its minor expression in the cell line here used. The CtGAPDH/CtPBGD ratio was 0.745 ± 0.023 for SAF and 0.760 ± 0.016 for LAF, with a clear trend to their increment (r2 = 0.9267 and, respectively, r2 = 0.9591) inversely related to the amount of template.
      The treated samples exhibited a reduced molecular weight with the loss of the 18S and 28S bands after 60 min of incubation, as assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The RT-qPCR analysis of 420 ng of these degraded samples showed that both targets were always detected, in both amplicon formats. However, a clear increment of the Ct, related to the extent of the hydrolysis (r2 = 0.887–0.998), was found for each of the four targets. As expected, this behavior was more marked in the LAF whose slopes were 0.641 and 0.663 for GAPDH and, respectively, for PDGD (vs 0.218 and 0.237 of the SAF). The CtGAPDH/CtPBGD ratios were, in mean, 0.719 ± 0.008 in the SAF and 0.755 ± 0.026 in the LAF with a direct correlation between their increments and the length of the degradation treatment (r2 = 0.795 for SAF and, respectively 0.721 for LAF).
      The increment of the Ct explains the low amount of targets that could be quantified in these samples. No more than 16.4% of the GAPDH and 7.1% of the PDGD could be quantified by the SAF after 11.5 h of the damaging treatment while, in agreement with the major length of their PCR products, only 1% of the original targets could be assessed by the LAF after the same time of degradation. In addition, a linear correlation (r2 =  0.904–0.988) between the RQ of the samples and the length of the hydrolysis was found.
      The qPCR data were also used to calculate the degradation index (D.I.) of these samples. As shown in Fig. 1, a strong correlation (r2 = 0.994) with the length of the hydrolysis was found.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Fig. 1Degradation index (D.I.) as assessed by the ratio between the QR of 60 vs 260 bp targets (Y axis) and the length of incubation at 70 °C (X axis; in minutes). Analysis performed on the housekeeping target GAPDH.

      4. Conclusions

      The aim of this study was to set up a rapid and reliable protocol that allows the controlled degradation of the RNA. The outcome of the aqueous hydrolysis at 70 °C was than assessed by RT and duplex-qPCR analysis of two housekeeping targets (GAPDH and the PBGD). The procedure proved to produce a time-depending outcome as assessed by the increment of the Ct. As expected [
      • Fleige S.
      • et al.
      Comparison of relative quantification models and impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
      ,
      • Fleige S.
      • Plaff M.W.
      RNA integrity and the effect on real-time qRT-PCR performance.
      ,
      • Vermuelen J.
      • et al.
      Measurable impact of RNA quality on gene expression results from quantitative PCR.
      ], RT-qPCR of longer targets was more sensitive to the degradation as the less expressed PDGB. In addition, even if both targets were always detected, a direct correlation between the increment of the CtGAPDH/CtPBGD and the length of the degradation treatment (r2 = 0.795 for SAF and, respectively 0.721 for LAF) was found. Therefore, the drop out of the less represented target PBGD is expected from massively degraded RNA. However, it is also true that the high Ct of the GAPDH should alert on the risk of misleading conclusion in such cases.
      Several methods, based on different analytical principles, are described to provide information on the level of RNA degradation [
      • Vermuelen J.
      • et al.
      Measurable impact of RNA quality on gene expression results from quantitative PCR.
      ,
      • Romero I.G.
      RNA-seq: impact of RNA degradation on transcript quantification.
      ]. In this work, the RQ data of two differently long fragments of the GAPDH transcript were employed to tentatively calculate a degradation index (D.I.) of the samples. Since a strong correlation (r2 =  0.994) between the QRs of the two targets and the length of the degradation was found, this approach could be of practical interest when dealing with degraded RNA samples.
      In Forensic Genetics, the RNA analysis is usually employed for a qualitative evaluation of tissue-specific transcripts [
      • Luusola J.
      • Ballantine J.
      Messenger RNA profiling: a prototype method to supplant conventional methods for body fluid identification.
      ,
      • Haas C.
      • et al.
      mRNA profiling for body fluid identification by reverse transcription end point PCR and realtime PCR.
      ,
      • Lindenbergh A.
      • et al.
      A multiplex (m)RNA-profiling system for the forensic identification of body fluids and contact traces.
      ]. Therefore, assuming that appropriate targets are studied, the data of this preliminary work indicate that misidentification of the source of body fluids is unlikely even in highly degraded samples.

      Conflict of interest

      None.

      References

        • Lindahl T.
        Heat inactivation of transfer ribonucleic acids.
        J. Biol. Chem. 1967; 242: 1970-1973
        • Fordyce S.
        • et al.
        Long-term RNA persistence in postmortem contexts.
        Inv. Genetics. 2013; 4: 7
        • Bustin S.A.
        • et al.
        The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real time PCR experiments.
        Clin. Chem. 2009; 55: 611-622
        • Luusola J.
        • Ballantine J.
        Messenger RNA profiling: a prototype method to supplant conventional methods for body fluid identification.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2003; 135: 85-96
        • Haas C.
        • et al.
        mRNA profiling for body fluid identification by reverse transcription end point PCR and realtime PCR.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2009; 3: 80-88
        • Lindenbergh A.
        • et al.
        A multiplex (m)RNA-profiling system for the forensic identification of body fluids and contact traces.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2012; 6: 565-577
        • Lin M.-H.
        • et al.
        Transcriptomic analysis of degraded forensic body fluids.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2015; 17: 35-42
        • Fleige S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of relative quantification models and impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
        Biotechnol. Lett. 2006; 28: 1601-1613
        • Fleige S.
        • Plaff M.W.
        RNA integrity and the effect on real-time qRT-PCR performance.
        Mol. Aspect Med. 2006; 27: 126-139
        • Vermuelen J.
        • et al.
        Measurable impact of RNA quality on gene expression results from quantitative PCR.
        Nucleic Acid Res. 2011; 39: e63
        • Romero I.G.
        RNA-seq: impact of RNA degradation on transcript quantification.
        BMC Biol. 2014; 12: 42