Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 5, e671-e673, December 2015

Missing population studies on the new European Standard set loci (ESS) and its impact on population statistics

  • Barbora Emmerova
    Affiliations
    Forensic DNA Service, Prague, Czech Republic

    Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Prague, Czech Republic
    Search for articles by this author
  • Edvard Ehler
    Affiliations
    Forensic DNA Service, Prague, Czech Republic

    Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Education, Department of Biology and Environmental Studies, Prague, Czech Republic
    Search for articles by this author
  • Daniel Vanek
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Forensic DNA Service, Janovskeho 18, 170 00 Prague 7, Czech Republic. Fax: +420 233 931 123.
    Affiliations
    Forensic DNA Service, Prague, Czech Republic

    Charles University in Prague, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
    Search for articles by this author
Published:November 26, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.11.001

      Abstract

      We have encountered a decrease in the number of population studies published in recent years. Allelic frequencies for the new European standard set of loci (D12S391, D1S1656, D2S441, D10S1248, and D22S1045) are not published for many countries. This can lead to bias in statistical evaluation of DNA typing results.

      Keywords

      1. Introduction

      STR (Short Tandem Repeats) analysis has been popular in the field of genetic fingerprinting of individuals since the 1990s. Currently, the number of publications concerning the application of STR loci to forensic DNA profiling goes beyond 3500 references [
      • Ruitberg C.M.
      • Reeder D.J.
      • Butler J.M.
      STRBase: a short tandem repeat DNA database for the human identity testing community.
      ]. The need for reliable STR typing has led to the selection of a “European standard set of loci,” which, in 2009, expanded with five new STR loci (D12S391, D1S1656, D2S441, D10S1248, and D22S1045) added to the already existing European Standard Set (ESS) of seven STRs (TH01, vWA, FGA, D8S1179, D18S51, D21S11, and D3S1358) [
      • Schneider P.M.
      Expansion of the European Standard Set of DNA database loci-the current situation.
      ].
      Since the year 2000, there has been a rapid decrease in the amount of DNA population data published after the Journal of Forensic Science (JFS) [
      • Gaensslen R.
      • Falsetti A.
      • Austin-Smith D.
      • Buikstra J.
      • Maples M.
      • Wiilley P.
      • et al.
      Journal policy on the publication of DNA population genetic data.
      ] and the Forensic Science International (FSI) [
      • Lincoln P.
      • Carracedo A.
      Publication of population data of human polymorphisms.
      ] reduced the amount of publication space that was allotted to population data. In 2005, JFS decided to stop publishing “For the Record”, a section concerning population STR datasets. There are still journals publishing DNA population data (e.g., FSI: Genetics, International Journal of Legal Medicine, Legal Medicine, FSI, JFS, Croatian Medical Journal, and others) but in very low numbers. Some journals, such as FSI: genetics, increased their minimum requirements for the submission [
      • Carracedo Á.
      • Butler J.M.
      • Gusmão L.
      • Linacre Á.
      • Parson W.
      • Roewer L.
      • et al.
      New guidelines for the publication of genetic population data.
      ]. In spite of recent rapid advances in sequencing technologies and introduction of new markers into forensic genetics field, autosomal STR are still the primary workhorse for the majority of forensic labs throughout Europe and precise allelic frequencies are the cornerstone of this method. Thus, the lack of accessible population studies may heavily impact the statistical evaluation of the DNA analysis.

      2. Material studied

      We performed an in silico retrospective survey of the number of population autosomal STR studies with the “new European standard set of loci” published recently (2009–2015). We used the Google scholar, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science online databases [
      • Falagas M.E.
      • Pitsouni E.I.
      • Malietzis G.A.
      • Pappas G.
      Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
      ,
      • Bakkalbasi N.
      • Bauer K.
      • Glover J.
      • Wang L.
      Three options for citation tracking: google scholar, scopus and web of science.
      ]. Additionally, the publications were sorted according to the country of origin, the size of the population tested and the number of autosomal STR analyzed.

      3. Results

      Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 summarize the population studies with the new ESS loci published recently (2009–2015). The data are sorted by country, scientific journal, population size, and the number of STRs tested (including the new ESS loci).
      Table 1Recent population studies on the new ESS STRs in Europe.
      CountryJournalAuthorsPopulation size#STRs
      AustriaFSI: GeneticsHatzer-Grubwieser, P., et al. (2012)21917
      BelgiumFSI: GeneticsDognaux, S., et al. (2012)21956
      CroatiaCroat. Med. J.Curic, G., et al. (2012)21715
      CroatiaPoster 7th ISABSDuji Biluši, S., et al. (2011)12020
      Czech republicFSI: Genetics S SVanek, D., et al. (2011)12015
      DenmarkFSI: GeneticsTomas, C., et al. (2014)98917
      DenmarkFSI: GeneticsTomas, C., et al. (2015)22317
      EstoniaInt. J. Legal Med.Sadam, M., et al. (2014)30322
      GermanyInt. J. Legal Med.Poetsch, M., et al. (2011)63917
      GermanyInt. J. Legal Med.Poetsch, M., et al. (2011)45717
      GermanyInt. J. Legal Med.Poetsch, M., et al. (2013)30017
      HungaryFSI: GeneticsMolnár, A., et al. (2011)2545
      ItalyFSI: GeneticsBarbaro, A., et al. (2012)20315
      ItalyFSI: GeneticsBerti, A., et al. (2011)20917
      ItalyCroat. Med. J.Cortellini, V., et al. (2011)955
      ItalyFSI: GeneticsCortellini, V., et al. (2011)2105
      ItalyFSI: GeneticsCortellini, V., et al. (2013)17415
      ItalyFSI: GeneticsPiglionica, M., et al. (2013)1505
      ItalyFSI: Genetics S SPrevidere, C., et al. (2011)9605
      ItalyFSI: GeneticsTurrina, S., et al. (2011)26617
      ItalyInt. J. Legal Med.Turrina, S., et al. (2014)30324
      ItalyInt. J. Legal Med.Turrina, S., et al. (2014)35923
      ItalyFSI: GeneticsVerzeletti, A., et al. (2013)5224
      MacedoniaFSI: GeneticsJakovski, Z., et al. (2012)20517
      NetherlandsPLoS ONEKraaijenbrink, T., et al. (2014)689921
      NetherlandsInt. J. Legal Med.Westen, A. A., et al. (2012)33530
      NetherlandsFSI: GeneticsWesten, A. A., et al. (2014)208523
      NorwayFSI: GeneticsDupuy, B. M., et al. (2013)958635
      PolandInt. J. Legal Med.Jedrzejczyk, M., et al. (2013)80015
      PolandLegal MedicineParys-Proszek, A., et al. (2010)15415
      PolandFSI: GeneticsSoltyszewski, I., et al. (2014)204115
      PortugalFSI: GeneticsAlmeida, C., et al. (2015)50221
      PortugalFSI: GeneticsBento, A. M., et al. (2013)15015
      PortugalFSI: GeneticsMelo, F., et al. (2014)37015
      PortugalFSI: GeneticsRibeiro, T., et al. (2013)45215
      PortugalFSI: GeneticsSouto, L., et al. (2013)10024
      RomaniaLegal MedicineAnghel, A., et al. (2014)33615
      RomaniaCroat. Med. J.Stanciu, F., et al. (2013)133115
      SloveniaCroat. Med. J.Pajnic, I. Z., et al. (2012)10223
      SloveniaCroat. Med. J.Pajnic, I. Z., et al. (2014)33315
      SpainFSI: GeneticsAznar, J. M., et al. (2014)89521
      SpainInt. J. Legal Med.Cardoso, S., et al. (2015)15516
      SpainFSI: GeneticsGarcía, O., et al. (2012)28421
      SpainFSI: GeneticsPhillips, C., et al. (2011)97120
      SpainFSI: GeneticsPhillips, C., et al. (2014)94123
      SwedenFSI: GeneticsAlbinsson., L., et al. (2011)42515
      SwitzerlandFSI: Genetics S SDion, D., et al. (2014)149817
      SwitzerlandInt. J. Legal Med.Gehrig, C., et al. (2014)66816
      TurkeyFSI: GeneticsBulbul, O., et al. (2014)14120
      UKFSI: GeneticsTucker, V.C., et al. (2011)30617
      UKFSI: GeneticsTucker, V. C., et al. (2012)105216
      UKFSI: GeneticsWelch, L.A., et al. (2012)553917
      Table 2Recent population studies on new ESS STRs in America.
      CountryJournalAuthorsPopulation size#STRs
      MoroccoFSI: Genetics S SEl Amri, H., et al. (2011)18015
      Table 3Recent population studies on the new ESS STRs in Asia.
      CountryJournalAuthorsPopulation size#STRs
      BangladeshLegal MedicineRahman, A. S., et al. (2013)10211
      ChinaFSI: GeneticsGuoa, F., et al. (2014)994824
      ChinaMol. Biol. Rep.Lei, L., et al. (2014)18326
      ChinaAdv. Mat. Res.Li, S.L., et al. (2013)19621
      ChinaGeneMeng, H. T., et al. (2015)22620
      ChinaLegal MedicineShen, C., et al. (2013)10621
      ChinaMol. Biol. Rep.Teng, Y., et al. (2012)12021
      ChinaElectrophoresisYuan, J. Y., et al. (2014)11421
      ChinaMol. Biol. Rep.Yuan, L., et al. (2012)10721
      ChinaLegal MedicineYuan, L., et al. (2014)15438
      ChinaFa yi xue za zhiZhang, S., et al. (2012)48412
      ChinaPlos OneZhang, S., et al. (2013)68117
      ChinaElectrophoresisZhang, S., et al. (2013)48412
      ChinaFSI: GeneticsZhang, S., et al. (2015)20025
      ChinaScientific Rep.Zhang, S., et al. (2015)27521
      ChinaInt. J. Legal Med.Zhu, B., et al. (2011)10421
      IndiaFSI: GeneticsKalpana, D., et al. (2012)75015
      JapanFSI: Genetics S SHashiayda, M., et al. (2013)40724
      JapanLegal Med.Ozeki, M. and K. Tamaki (2013)17537
      PhilippinesLegal Med.Rodriguez, J. J. R. B., et al. (2015)16723
      Republic of KoreaJ. Legal Med.Han Jun Jin et al. (2013)41118
      Republic of KoreaFSI: GeneticsPark, J. H., et al. (2013)52623
      Republic of KoreaGenes GenomYoo, S. Y., et al. (2014)54523
      Table 4Recent population studies on the new ESS STRs in Africa.
      CountryJournalAuthorsPopulation size#STRs
      ArgentinaFSI: GeneticsVullo, C., et al. (2010)50612
      BrazilFSI: GeneticsAlmeida Prado Oliveira e Sousa, M. L., et al. (2014)109816
      BrazilInt. J. Legal Med.Raimann, P.E., et al. (2012)83515
      BrazilFSI: GeneticsRodenbusch, R., et al. (2012)3535
      EcuadorFSI: Genetics S SGaviria, A., et al. (2013)180022
      PeruFSI: Genetics S SIannacone, G.C, et al. (2011)20315
      USAInt. J. Legal Med.Budowle, B., et al. (2011)103415
      USAFSI: GeneticsHill, C. R., et al. (2011)144317
      USAFSI: GeneticsHill, C. R., et al. (2013)103629

      4. Discussion

      A majority of DNA identification laboratories possess the allele frequencies of the major population and important sub-populations (e.g., from the surrounding countries, different ethnic groups, immigrant isolated groups). However, problems arise when the laboratory should statistically evaluate the results of the DNA analysis for the person from a population whose population data has not been published and is not accessible by other means (e.g., personal communication or specialized websites such as the STRbase). This can lead to significant decrease of statistical power of commonly used tests and measures, which can result in a false paternity or kinship analysis or misidentification with a subsequent wrongful conviction [
      The potential for error in forensic DNA testing (and how that complicates the use of DNA databases for criminal identification).
      ].

      5. Conclusion

      Allelic frequencies for the new European standard set of loci (D12S391, D1S1656, D2S441, D10S1248, and D22S1045) are not published for many countries. This can lead to improper statistical evaluation of DNA typing results.

      Conflict of interest

      The authors of this manuscript have no conflict of interest

      Funding

      The work in this project was supported by the Czech Science Foundation, grant no. 14-36938G.

      References

        • Ruitberg C.M.
        • Reeder D.J.
        • Butler J.M.
        STRBase: a short tandem repeat DNA database for the human identity testing community.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29: 320-322
        • Schneider P.M.
        Expansion of the European Standard Set of DNA database loci-the current situation.
        Profiles DNA. 2009; 12: 6-7
        • Gaensslen R.
        • Falsetti A.
        • Austin-Smith D.
        • Buikstra J.
        • Maples M.
        • Wiilley P.
        • et al.
        Journal policy on the publication of DNA population genetic data.
        J. Forensic Sci. 1999; 44
        • Lincoln P.
        • Carracedo A.
        Publication of population data of human polymorphisms.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2000; 110: 3-5
        • Carracedo Á.
        • Butler J.M.
        • Gusmão L.
        • Linacre Á.
        • Parson W.
        • Roewer L.
        • et al.
        New guidelines for the publication of genetic population data.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2013; 7: 217-220
        • Falagas M.E.
        • Pitsouni E.I.
        • Malietzis G.A.
        • Pappas G.
        Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
        FASEB J. 2008; 22: 338-342
        • Bakkalbasi N.
        • Bauer K.
        • Glover J.
        • Wang L.
        Three options for citation tracking: google scholar, scopus and web of science.
        Biomed. Digital Lib. 2006; 3: 7
      1. The potential for error in forensic DNA testing (and how that complicates the use of DNA databases for criminal identification).
        Council for Responsible Genetics (CRG) National Conference: Forensic Dna Databases and Race: Issues, Abuses and Actions. 2008;