Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 77-79, December 2009

Customizing a commercial laboratory information management system for a forensic genetic laboratory

Section of Forensic Genetics, Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 11 Frederik V's Vej, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Received 13 July 2009; accepted 29 July 2009. published online 23 September 2009.

Article Outline

Abstract 

The need for high-throughput laboratories to comply with regulatory requirements makes data management an important aspect of forensic genetics. A Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) enables efficient workflows and ensures traceability if designed and implemented properly. We customized a commercial LIMS to support STR typing of reference samples according to in-house defined requirements. The customization focused on data validity, traceability and automated solutions.

Keywords: LIMS, Automation, Traceability, Forensic genetics

 

Back to Article Outline

1. Introduction 

A well-functioning Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) is essential to forensic genetic laboratories that handle large volumes of data according to accreditation standards. We decided to implement a new LIMS for management of reference sample STR (short tandem repeat) typing in order to increase efficiency and to replace paper-based procedures with electronic traceability. To achieve a LIMS tailored to our needs within a reasonable time and budget, we chose to customize a commercial product, LabWare LIMS.

Back to Article Outline

2. Materials and methods 

A Microsoft SQL Server 2005 database was combined with the client/server application LabWare LIMS version 5.02m from the automation software vendor LabWare, Inc. (Wilmington, DE, USA). The system was extended with LabWare's Forensics module, which provides functionalities for management of cases and evidential materials. Customization of LabWare LIMS was achieved with the scripting language LIMS Basic. Data validation via double entry was enabled by a product from AnyDoc Software, Inc. (Tampa, FL, USA).

Back to Article Outline

3. Results and discussion 

3.1. Process flow 

The configurability of LabWare LIMS was used to create a system that supports the entire process of STR typing reference samples. The process flow includes the following steps:

1.Request for examination of reference sample is received.

2.Requisition is scanned and processed using AnyDoc software.

3.A new case containing the reference sample is created in LabWare LIMS.

4.Sample fractions undergo STR typing, managed via LabWare LIMS (Fig. 1).
  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 1. 

    Example of instrument integration. FTA Cards are labeled with a barcode containing the LIMS sample number. The barcode is scanned when the FTA Card is punched using a BSD600 punch instrument and the sample number is included in the instrument output file. The output file is imported into the LIMS and a batch with a sample fraction from each sample in the file is automatically created. The well information in the file dictates the positions of the sample fractions in the batch.


5.STR data are analyzed using Genotyper or FSS-i3.

6.Results are imported into LabWare LIMS and evaluated (Fig. 2).
  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 2. 

    Result evaluation in LabWare LIMS. The STR profile of a reference sample (Consensus DNA Profile) is based on results from at least to sample fractions (Fraction DNA Profile), which in turn are based on STR data evaluated by two analysts (Data Analysis).


7.STR profile and case data are reported in an XML file.

3.2. Data validity and traceability 

Ensuring data validity and traceability was a focal point in the implementation of the new LIMS. LabWare LIMS includes an audit trail facility that provides traceability via audit logs, which we supplemented with tailor-made reports focusing on specific events.

A procedure for double data entry was created to enable accurate transfer of information from requisitions to the LIMS. The procedure, which involves OCR processing and manual data entry, was developed using AnyDoc software. Furthermore, LabWare's approval management system was configured to ensure that changes made to valid data by one individual must be approved by another individual before the new information is considered valid.

3.3. Sample flow and instrument integration 

Special emphasis was also put on developing automated solutions and advanced functions for batch handling of samples. The LIMS supports STR typing of all types of reference samples. FTA Cards account for the majority of samples. Sample fractions are collated in batches on each laboratory step. After a punch procedure, FTA Card fractions go through a wash step, PCR and electrophoresis. Fig. 1 illustrates the automatic generation of a wash step batch based on an output file from a BSD600 punch instrument (BSD Robotics, Australia). Other examples of instrument integration in the LIMS are creation of worklists for liquid handler robots and generation of plate records for ABI 3130 XL instruments.

The batch management customizations include a functionality for the creation of a batch from a batch at the preceding laboratory step. For example, a PCR batch can be created from a wash batch so that sample fractions that were successfully processed in the wash step are included in the PCR batch. If an entire laboratory procedure fails, the corresponding batch can be annulled, and the annulment feature automatically reassigns new laboratory tests to the affected samples according to type of batch and type of reference sample.

3.4. Result evaluation 

When the sample fractions have been processed in the laboratory, electrophoresis results are evaluated in a multistep process (Fig. 2):

1.STR data are analyzed by two individuals using Genotyper or FSS-i3. An automated import service attaches the analysis results (Data Analysis) to the sample fractions.

2.Automated comparison of the Data Analysis contents: if the two analysts made identical conclusions, the results are saved in the Fraction DNA Profile. If the Data Analysis results are not identical, the sample fraction undergoes individual inspection.

3.Automated retesting: analyst remarks trigger assignment of new laboratory tests. This automated retesting is restricted by a set of rules to avoid inexpedient processing.

4.Automated comparison of Fraction DNA Profiles on all sample fractions: if results in the Fraction DNA Profiles are concordant and complete, the Consensus DNA Profile is generated. If results are discordant or incomplete, the sample undergoes individual inspection.

5.Automated evaluation of the Consensus DNA Profile: the STR profile is compared to a list of commonly observed alleles to ensure inspection of unusual results. In addition, the profile is compared to profiles from other reference samples derived from the same person to detect unexpected inconsistencies.

Back to Article Outline

4. Conclusion 

We have successfully customized and implemented a commercial LIMS that fulfils the requirements of an ISO 17025 accredited forensic genetic laboratory in regard to traceability and data quality and provides automated solutions for laboratory procedures and result handling.

Back to Article Outline

Conflict of interest 

None.

Back to Article Outline

Role of funding 

None.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgements 

We thank Signe A. Hansen, Tanja Bonde, Lars Hesselberg, Gethyn Boustead and Michal Virag for technical assistance.

PII: S1875-1768(09)00028-6

doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2009.07.012

Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 77-79, December 2009